A)
My main question has changed a bit, and I will
be focusing on the controversy of hunting around the globe as a legitimate means
of conservation. For this post though,
my first focus will be on hunting effects on the population management, in
specific, nature running its core or hunting being useful as a management technique?
B)
Heffelfinger, James R., Valerius Geist, and William
Wishart. "The Role Of Hunting In North American Wildlife
Conservation." International Journal Of Environmental Studies 70.3
(2013): 399-413. Environment Complete. Web. 1 Oct. 2015.
Within this article there was a wide range of ideas and
thoughts on hunting as a conservation method.
For this question though, I think it best to focus on the beginning
section of this writing. At the
beginning of this article, subtitles including "managing animal abundance" get
right to the issue at hand. This article
gives some pros to hunting in that it manages in many cases wild animal and
human interactions that do not end well.
On the counter side to this, the article does note that overpopulation wouldn’t
be nearly as much of an idea or problem if the predator populations were not
being pursued also. Tied into this
population control, the article mentions a bit about how males of most species
are hunted more heavily then females, thus resulting in thrown off ratios then
would naturally be occurring. This ratio problem could lead to concerns about
delays in breeding rates, and thus producing smaller weaker offspring that
would suffer tremendously and most likely suffer death trying to make it
through the winter. Picking out the
prized, and usually the oldest males in a population is a well known practice
in hunting. Could it lead to a genetic
decline and thus problems with a species and ecosystem? With the better genes being shot and killed
by hunters, the potential of inferior or lesser genes have the potential to
continue breeding and making it on to the next generation. These are the important points that I have
grabbed from this article, there are many more points that will later on help
me develop my thesis when it come to other questions.
After looking at this source, I have come to kind of think
about the hunting world that I have so long been subjected to. I personally do not have a problem with
hunting, but I am starting to really see a side to non-hunters, or a side to
smaller harvest rates. This article, though not more then 3 pages for the
portion that I am using for this question, gives a good amount of insight to
the controversy of hunting being used as a conservation technique. One of the new ideas that I haven’t always
been thinking about in hunting, is the pursuit of the biggest and best looking,
or antlered animal. Age structure I
believe is where hunting should occur as a conservation technique. One animal might be more presentable to a
hunter, but the older deer should be the ones harvested. The most outstanding topic, that I have never
even heard talked about was the idea of ratio problems that lead to a delay in
breeding, thus causing problems to the offspring. This article has opened my eyes in way that
gives me understanding that deer hunting in this article, can be done
successfully for conservation. With that
being said, I understand that the current hunting practices of many need to be
changed in order to make this conservation strong and noticeable.
Question and Plan:
The new questions that have raised from this article stem
mostly from conservation and what it really means to conserve the environment. I
really need to look into conservation and know more about what data and ideas
of conservation play a role to the populations of animals. As my research continues on, for this topic
in particular, I need to go more in depth on one or more of these topics that I
covered in the summary portion. I now
have a starting point, and there really needs to be some more direction to
population management. My new direction
for this paper, at this point anyways starts with that hunting is not and
overall bad thing. For all I know, I might
find a lot wrong with hunting by the end of this and hate it. For now, though, I would like move my
attention to make hunting a more well known practice. I believe that hunting isn’t communicated to
many people, and if there was some sort of education about hunting, it may
bring on a whole new idea to this conservation.
Conservation when thinking about how I have used it, to most would be
the process of sustaining, preserving, or building up of animal populations and
environment. When I think conservation
for this paper, I would like people to think of conservation and protection of
more then just the animal populations I mention hunters pursue. Conservation for this paper will mean a well
being for people, the animal population, and even potentially farm
animals. This research is leading me in
many new and exciting ideas, I just hope that as I look up articles that they
all can fit together correctly in order to identify if hunting can really be
used as a conservation technique?
No comments:
Post a Comment